There is sufficient evidence that the very nature of the physical constants of the universe are exactly determined to make life thrive. Even the least deviation of even one of these would make life here impossible. Thus the very exact requirements for life here call out for a designer. Would any of you have the audacity to enter the Louve and insist that the paintings by Renoir, Michelangelo are really painters drop cloths? I think not. The world around us displays the same obvious earmarks of a masterful artist. From reasons.org Exact requirements for life… flux of cosmic ray protons if too small: inadequate cloud formation in planet’s troposphere if too large: too much cloud formation in planet’s troposphere solar wind if too weak: too many cosmic ray protons reach planet’s troposphere causing too much cloud formation if too strong: too few cosmic ray protons reach planet’s troposphere causing too little cloud formation parent star luminosity relative to speciation if increases too soon: runaway green house effect would develop if increases too late: runaway glaciation would develop surface gravity (escape velocity) if stronger: planet’s atmosphere would retain too much ammonia and methane if weaker: planet’s atmosphere would lose too much water distance from parent star if farther: planet would be too cool for a stable water cycle if closer: planet would be too warm for a stable water cycle inclination of orbit if too great: temperature differences on the planet would be too extreme orbital eccentricity if too great: seasonal temperature differences would be too extreme axial tilt if greater: surface temperature differences would be too great if less: surface temperature differences would be too great rate of change of axial tilt if greater: climatic changes would be too extreme; surface temperature differences would become too extreme rotation period if longer: diurnal temperature differences would be too great if shorter: atmospheric wind velocities would be too great rate of change in rotation period if longer:surface temperature range necessary for life would not be sustained if shorter:surface temperature range necessary for life would not be sustained planet age if too young: planet would rotate too rapidly if too old: planet would rotate too slowly magnetic field if stronger: electromagnetic storms would be too severe; too few cosmic ray protons would reach planet’s troposphere which would inhibit adequate cloud formation if weaker: ozone shield would be inadequately protected from hard stellar and solar radiation thickness of crust if thicker: too much oxygen would be transferred from the atmosphere to the crust if thinner: volcanic and tectonic activity would be too great albedo (ratio of reflected light to total amount falling on surface) if greater: runaway glaciation would develop if less: runaway greenhouse effect would develop asteroidal and cometary collision rate if greater: too many species would become extinct if less: crust would be too depleted of materials essential for life oxygen to nitrogen ratio in atmosphere if larger: advanced life functions would proceed too quickly if smaller: advanced life functions would proceed too slowly carbon dioxide level in atmosphere if greater: runaway greenhouse effect would develop if less: plants would be unable to maintain efficient photosynthesis water vapor level in atmosphere if greater: runaway greenhouse effect would develop if less: rainfall would be too meager for advanced life on the land atmospheric electric discharge rate if greater: too much fire destruction would occur if less: too little nitrogen would be fixed in the atmosphere ozone level in atmosphere if greater: surface temperatures would be too low if less: surface temperatures would be too high; there would be too much uv radiation at the surface oxygen quantity in atmosphere if greater: plants and hydrocarbons would burn up too easily if less: advanced animals would have too little to breathe nitrogen quantity in atmosphere