Hello John and Doves,
The Russia-Ukraine
Conflict Isn't Unprovoked!
The Biden
administration, and it's controlled MSM, has manipulated the
American people into thinking that Ukraine, the U.S., Europe
are innocent of any provocations and it's all Russia's
fault! They have repeatedly told the American people
that this attack by Russia on Ukraine was
'unprovoked'. That Ukraine is a 'democracy' that the
U.S. must protect from Russia. And that it is Russia's
intention to take Ukraine and move across Europe. All
lies.
If people refuse
to look at the history of the area; if they refuse to look
at NATO expansion since the 1990s; if they refuse to look at
the agreements between the West and Russia; if they refuse
to take Russia's security concerns seriously - then they
will keep the war drums banging, and blindly, like
unfortunate lemmings, dash into the abyss, as the warmongers
lead the world into WWIII.
In this letter I
included Jeffrey D. Sachs' article titled: "The War in
Ukraine Was Provoked - and Why This Matters to Achieve
Peace". Sachs is a University Professor at Columbia
University and a specialist in global economy and
sustainable development. He testified to the UN
Security Council on November 20, 2023. He told TPTB
that the Ukraine War could be ended with agreements within
the UN Security Council - stop the external finances and
armaments, and use diplomacy instead of weaponry - simply
provide a security guarantee to Russia that NATO will not
expand into Ukraine.
The problem is, certain
members of the U.N. Security Council WANT THE WAR WITH
RUSSIA.
Sachs puts the blame for
the war squarely on the U.S. (and Victoria Nuland's name
comes up again) - but I say that the there is plenty of
blame to go around - the U.K., France, Germany, Poland
- these four most notably. So these four all have fed
off of each other - with their warmongers and manipulators.
And now we have a peace
maker as President - Donald Trump. And THEIR plans are
being challenged. But will it be enough to stop
WWIII? Many are accusing President Trump of 'siding'
or 'joining' with Putin/Russia. Trump has suspended
funding along with military aid to Ukraine. And Trump
stopped military intelligence support for the Ukrainian
military. Britain, Germany, France are going to have
to step up if they want to continue with this war. And
the EU wants a $840 billion defense investment to "rearm
Europe", but this is 'over years'. European countries
are trying to figure out how to fill the 'void' that Trump
has created.
The EU is holding an
emergency summit in Brussels. "Leaders from all 27
European Union nations, plus Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky, gathered in Brussels on Thursday for an emergency
summit on how best to support embattled Ukraine and
strengthen the continent's defense as the United States
distances itself from its traditional allies."
This summit could be the
end of EU funding for Ukraine as certain member states are
against military and financial support of Ukraine - like
Hungary and Slovakia. Maybe a "coalition of the
willing" will need to be set up with the UK, Norway, Canada,
France, Poland. If Hungary veto's their plans the
European Parliament said, "If they prefer to play Putin's
game, we will go without them."
The EU Member States
want to "massively step up their support to Ukraine."
They really think they can take on Russia?
Polish PM Donald Tusk is
calling for Europe to "escalate its military buildup,
claiming Russia will lose like the USSR". He's
accusing Putin of starting an arms race.
EU
must win arms race Poland
And then there is
Putin/Russia - what do they want for a Peace Deal? It
appears Russia doesn't want a temporary ceasefire.
They want "firm agreements on a final settlement". And
it's not likely Russia will return any territory to
Ukraine. (Which is unacceptable to Ukraine and some
European countries.)
And I wonder about the gang of warmongers in the US
- Nuland, Blinken, Sullivan, various people in Congress -
are they secretly meeting with Zelensky? Is their
CIA still providing military intelligence to
Ukraine? Is money still getting to Ukraine?
Are they making plans and arrangements? This is
their war, after all.
I also wrote about the
history, the background, the agreements, etc. to bring
better clarity to this regional war that could go
global. Too many lies have been told by the Biden
administration and some of the record needs to be set
straight. I've attempted to do that in the brief write
ups below. Sachs has a very good grasp on 'the
situation'. And there is an article about Merkel (Germany)
admitting the MINSK agreement was to buy time for Ukraine to
rearm - not to make peace with Russia.
NATO Enlargement
and Jeffrey Sachs:
In this article from May
23, 2023, Jeffrey D. Sachs explains the reality of the
Ukraine-Russia conflict. NATO expansionism is
at the center of this war. Diplomacy, not weapons,
can end it.
"..the Biden
administration has repeatedly and falsely claimed that the
Ukraine War started with an unprovoked attack by Russia on
Ukraine on February 24, 2022. In fact, the war was
provoked by the U.S. in ways that leading U.S. diplomats
anticipated for decades in the lead-up to the war, meaning
that the war could have been avoided and should now be
stopped through negotiations."
"Recognizing that the
war was provoked helps us to understand how to stop
it. It doesn't justify Russia's invasion."
Two main U.S.
provocations:
The U.S. intention to
expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia "in order to surround
Russia in the Black Sea region by NATO countries (Ukraine,
Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Georgia)."
The U.S. role in
installing a Russophobic regime in Ukraine by the violent
overthrow of Ukraine's pro-Russian President, Viktor
Yanukovych, in February 2014. The shooting war
in Ukraine began with Yanukovych's overthrow nine years
ago, not in February 2022, as the U.S. government, NATO
and the G7 leaders would have us believe."
"The archives show
irrefutably that the U.S. and German governments repeatedly
promised to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO
would not move "one inch eastward" when the Soviet Union
disbanded the Warsaw Pact military alliance."
U.S. plans to expand
NATO began in the early 1990s. Everyone knew any
expansion east by NATO would not sit well with Russia.
The 2008 U.S. Ambassador to Russia, William Burns (who later
became CIA Director) warned of "grave risks of NATO
enlargement". In a cable to Washington, he
wrote: "Ukraine and Georgia's NATO aspirations not
only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serous
concerns about the consequences for stability in the
region. Not only does Russia perceive encirclement and
efforts to undermine Russia's influence in the region, but
it also fears unpredictable and uncontrolled consequences
which would seriously affect Russian security
interests.
Experts tell us
that Russia is particularly worried that the strong
divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership, with much of
the ethnic-Russian community against membership, could
lead to a major split, involving violence or at worst,
civil war. In that eventuality, Russia would have to
decide whether to intervene; a decision Russia does not want to have to
face."
That was back in
2008!
"Ukraine's leaders knew
clearly that pressing for NATO enlargement to Ukraine would
mean war. Former Zelensky advisor Oleksiy
Arestovych declared in a 2019 interview: "that our
price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia."
The U.S.
government actively sought to overthrow Yanukovych - "as
captured in the tape of then U.S. Assistant Secretary of
State Victoria Nuland (see my other letter today about
Nuland) and U.S. Ambassador (to Ukraine) Geoffrey Pyatt
planning the post-Yanukovych government weeks before the
violent overthrow of Yanukovych."
Nuland makes it very
clear the she, Vice President Biden, and his national
security advisor Jake Sullivan were "now at the center of
U.S. policy vis-a-vis Ukraine." The U.S. "armed and
helped the Ukrainian army to make it interoperable with
NATO. In 2021, NATO and the Biden administration
strongly recommitted to Ukraine's future in NATO."
After Yanukovych was
overthrown, the war in Donbas broke out and Russia took
Crimea.
In December 17, 2021
Putin presented a draft for a US - Russia Treaty that
"called for a halt to NATO enlargement. That same day,
Putin addressed Russia and "declared NATO enlargement to be
a central reason for the invasion."
"In March 2022, Russia
and Ukraine reported progress towards a quick negotiated end
to the war based on Ukraine's neutrality. According to
Naftali Bennett, former Prime Minister of Israel, who was a
mediator, an agreement was close to being reached before the
U.S., U.K. and France blocked it."
"While the Bide
administration declares Russia's invasion to be unprovoked,
Russia pursued diplomatic options in 2021 to avoid war, while Biden rejected
diplomacy, insisting that Russia had no say
whatsoever on the question of NATO enlargement. And
Russia pushed diplomacy in March 2022, while the Biden team
again blocked a diplomatic end to the war."
"By recognizing that the
question of NATO enlargement is at the center of this war,
we understand why U.S. weaponry will not end this war.
Russia will escalate as necessary to prevent NATO
enlargement to Ukraine. The key to peace in Ukraine is
through negotiations based on Ukraine's neutrality and NATO
non-enlargement."
"The Biden
administration's insistence on NATO enlargement to Ukraine
has made Ukraine a victim of misconceived and unachievable
U.S. military aspirations. It's time for the
provocations to stop, and for negotiations to restore peace
to Ukraine."
Sachs wrote that in May
of 2023 - since then tens of thousands of people have died -
on both sides. For a war brought about by the U.S. and
European 'meddling'.
It wasn't just Biden,
Sullivan, Blinken, Nuland pushing for war with Russia...the
U.K. under PMs Johnson and Stalmer and Macron have fanned
the flames of war against Russia.
The video in the link
below is an excellent 'educational' talk by Jeffrey Sachs.
(my notes for a quick
summary)
He asks, "What was
Putin's intention in the war?" We were told he was going to
take over Ukraine. This is false. Putin wanted
to keep NATO, aka the U.S., off of Russia's border.
He asked, "What is
NATO?" "It's the United States."
In 1991 an agreement was
made that NATO would not move one inch eastward.
However, the U.S. decided "there would be no end to eastward
enlargement of NATO."
Bill Clinton, in 1994,
signed off on NATO enlargement to the east all the way to
Ukraine and Georgia.
In 1999, Hungary, Poland
and Czechia (the Czech Republic) joined NATO.
Russia protested.
In 2004, Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia and Slovakia
joined NATO. Russia protested.
In 2007, President Putin
said "stop", '"enough."
In 2008, the U.S. pushed
for Ukraine and Georgia to join NATO. Russia
protested.
The U.S. wouldn't like
Russia putting a military base across the Rio Grande in
Mexico or across the Canadian border.
In 2010, the U.S. put
Aegis missile systems in Poland and Romania.
In 2010, Yanukovych was
elected - on the platform of neutrality. Russia was
negotiating a 25 year lease for Sevastopol naval base.
Russia wasn't trying to take the Donbas or Crimea.
They wanted a port.
In 2014, the US worked
actively to overthrow Yanukovych. Victoria Nuland was
in the middle of this.
Then came MINSK and
MINSK II - there should be autonomy for Russian speaking
regions in eastern Ukraine. This was supported
unanimously by the UN Security Council. "The U.S. and
Ukraine decided this was not to be enforced." Blinken
told Lavrov in January 2022 the U.S. reserves the right to
put missile systems wherever it wants.
Then the war
started. Putin wanted to force Zelensky to negotiate
neutrality. This happened within 7 days of the start
of the war. Ukraine walked away from this agreement
because the U.S. under Biden/Blinken told them to. The
idea by the U.S. was to block Russia from access to the
Black Sea with Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and
Georgia - these would deprive Russia of any international
status by blocking the Black Sea.
"And the American
Senators who are as nasty and cynical and corrupt as
imaginable, say this is wonderful expenditure of our money
because no Americans are dying - it's a pure proxy
war." The U.S has talked negotiators away from the
table and about a million Ukrainians have died or been
severely injured.
Merkel Admits
MINSK Agreement To Buy Time For Military Build Up in
Ukraine:
In December 2022, Angela
Merkel admitted to the real reason for the MINSK
agreement. She admitted that "the MINSK agreement
served to buy time for Ukraine's rearmament." (I wrote
about this back in 2022 in a Doves letter. A shocking
admission!)
Merkel (Germany),
Holland (France), Pororshenko (Ukraine) and Putin (Russia)
all signed the MINSK agreement in September 2014 - it had
been "portrayed as an effort towards peace.."
So how did that MINSK
agreement come about?
In February, 2014, the
U.S. and Germany "organized a coup in Ukraine ...that used
fascist militias to help pro-NATO regime come to
power." These right-wing nationalists (NAZIs) "divided
the country" especially in the majority Russian-speaking
east, where the prospect of being ruled by Ukrainian
ultranationalists was met with horror." (This reminded
me of Obama et al creating ISIS in the Middle East to try
and 'balance things out'. Another utter failure.)
"Russia, fearing for its
Black Sea fleet base in Sevastopol, annexed Crimea with the
help of a referendum. Russian-backed separatists
proclaimed independent republics in Donetsk and Luhansk in
eastern Ukraine."
The Ukrainian military
had mass desertions - soldiers unwilling to "sacrifice
themselves for the new regime".
Merkel (Germany) and
Hollande (France) "organized the MINSK agreement - as Merkel
now admits - to freeze the conflict and buy time. The
agreement included a cease-fire, the withdrawal of heavy
weapons and the establishment of a security zone."
Among other things.
Little of this was
actually implemented. "The Ukrainian side boycotted
all agreements. It didn't want a negotiated
settlement. Poroshenko (Ukraine) latched on to the
Azov battalion and other fascist militias - who moved
against Donetsk and Luhansk - the pro-Russian areas of
Ukraine.
The backers of the new
regime in Berlin and Washington, "were never interested in
a peaceful solution. They were interested in buying
time to escalate the war - even if it had
disastrous consequences for the population of the affected
areas." The plan all along was to isolate Russia
"ruthlessly" sacrificing the fate of the Ukrainian
population for this goal.
"Russia's
decision to take military action against Ukraine was the
predictable - and intended - reaction to this NATO
offensive."
"But the claim that the
war was triggered by Russia breaking into the "Garden of
Eden" of Western democracy is a lie. The main
responsibility lied with the NATO powers, which wanted and
deliberately provoked the war." "They stifled any
attempt at a negotiated solution."
"In reality, NATO has
long been waging a war against the nuclear power Russia,
risking the nuclear annihilation of mankind."
In Conclusion:
The European warmongers
are bound and determined to get their war with Russia.
In fact, they believe they are already at war with
Russia. They don't have enough money, armaments,
munitions, soldiers to take on Russia. And if the EU
can't get a consensus, they'll find a "coalition of the
willing ". Guess France could lob a few nukes over
into Russia. Good luck with that.
And a big part of the EU
doesn't want war with Russia. Biden and his
warmongers had promised a victory to Ukraine....guess no
one considered God wouldn't put the American warmongers
back in power.
President Trump is
putting pressure on Zelensky/Ukraine to come to peace terms
with Putin. What will the concessions be for
Zelensky? For Putin? And Zelensky keeps flip
flopping. Are Germany, the U.K., France making him
promises?
And then I wonder if Victoria
Nuland's gang are in contact with Zelensky? What do
they have planned? What promises are they making
Ukraine? After all, much of this war is their doing!
God has His plan.
And that's what is unfolding. Not man's plan.
Maybe Europe will get their WWIII. Pete Hegseth told the
Europeans that the U.S. will not get involved if European
countries keep pushing for war with Russia. They are
on their own. Will we hold firm to that...say, if
Canada gets involved with a war with Russia? That's
awfully close to U.S. soil.
We know we are fast
approaching the start of the Tribulation. Maybe that's
where they will get their war. God is getting all the
players in place and the countries lined up.
Hopefully we won't see
any of this war....
Pray for the peace of
Jerusalem!
Maranatha!
Chance